The S&P 500 has long been the gold standard for equity performance, a benchmark against which all other investments are measured. For decades, investors have asked whether any sector—or any strategy—can consistently beat the broad market. Today, amid climate disasters, geopolitical instability, and historic shifts in monetary policy, one corner of the market is attracting sophisticated attention: Insurance ETFs. But can a basket of insurance company stocks, packaged into an exchange-traded fund, actually outperform the iconic S&P 500? The answer is not a simple yes or no. It’s a compelling story of cyclical advantage, defensive fortitude, and unique catalysts that set this sector apart.
To understand the potential of insurance ETFs, we must first look under the hood. Insurance companies operate on a fundamentally different model than most other businesses. Their profitability isn't just about collecting premiums; it's about what they do with that money in the interim.
Insurers make money in two primary ways. First, through underwriting profit—the difference between the premiums collected and the claims paid out. This is the pure insurance business. Second, and crucially, they generate investment income. They invest the vast pools of capital (known as the float) from premiums into bonds, mortgages, and other conservative instruments. In a rising interest rate environment, like the one engineered by the Federal Reserve to combat inflation, this investment income skyrockets. Newly purchased bonds yield significantly higher returns, directly boosting insurers' bottom lines. This is a tailwind most tech companies in the S&P 500 don't enjoy.
Investors don't have to pick individual insurance stocks. ETFs like the SPDR S&P Insurance ETF (KIE) and the iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) provide diversified exposure to the sector. These funds hold a mix of property & casualty (P&C), life, health, and reinsurance giants—companies like Chubb, Progressive, and MetLife. This diversification within the sector mitigates the risk of any single company's missteps while capturing the overall industry's trends.
The global landscape is fraught with challenges that paradoxically create a powerful setup for the insurance industry. While these events cause human and economic hardship, they also highlight the indispensable value of insurance and drive fundamental economic shifts that benefit the sector.
We are in the midst of a pronounced "hard market" in insurance. This is a cycle where premiums rise dramatically due to increased demand and a constrained supply of coverage. Climate change is a primary driver. The escalating frequency and severity of hurricanes, wildfires, and floods have resulted in hundreds of billions of dollars in losses. In response, insurers are not only raising rates significantly but also refining their risk models and, in some cases, withdrawing from high-risk areas like California and Florida. This leads to higher premiums for the coverage that remains, directly boosting insurers' revenue and potential underwriting profits.
The war in Ukraine, tensions in the South China Sea, and the persistent threat of global terrorism have made political risk insurance more critical and expensive than ever. Furthermore, the digitalization of everything has spawned a massive new market: cyber insurance. As ransomware attacks cripple businesses and municipalities, the demand for cyber coverage is exploding. This is a high-growth segment within the staid insurance industry, offering new revenue streams that didn't exist a decade ago.
As mentioned earlier, the Fed's rate-hiking cycle is a supercharger for insurance company profits. Unlike banks, which can see their loan portfolios stressed by higher rates, insurers' large bond holdings see an immediate and positive impact on their investment yields. This environment allows them to earn substantial risk-free income on their float, making their business models incredibly robust in the current climate. This is a stark contrast to the growth-oriented tech sector, which is often valued on future earnings discounted back to the present—a calculation that becomes less favorable as interest rates rise.
Betting against the S&P 500 has been a losing game for most investors over the long term. Its strengths are well-documented and formidable.
The S&P 500 is not an index; it's a snapshot of the American economy. It provides instant diversification across every major sector—technology, healthcare, financials, consumer discretionary, and more. This diversification is its greatest defense. When insurance is struggling, tech might be thriving, or vice versa. The index automatically captures the next wave of innovation. The massive outperformance of the "Magnificent Seven" tech stocks in recent years is a testament to how the index's market-cap weighting allows it to ride the coattails of the most successful companies on earth.
ETFs that track the S&P 500, like SPY or IVV, are among the most liquid financial instruments in the world. They also boast incredibly low expense ratios, meaning more of an investor's money stays invested and compounds over time. While insurance ETFs are liquid, they cannot compete with the sheer trading volume and cost efficiency of the broad market ETFs.
The outcome of this debate largely depends on the economic and market environment.
In a bull market fueled by economic growth and low inflation, the S&P 500, with its heavy weighting in high-growth tech stocks, is likely to outperform. Investor optimism drives money into riskier assets, and the insurance sector can look boring by comparison.
However, in the environment we find ourselves in today—characterized by elevated inflation, higher interest rates, and elevated geopolitical and climate risk—the tables can turn. The S&P 500 becomes more volatile, sensitive to Fed policy and recession fears. During periods of market stress or stagflation, the defensive nature of insurance, coupled with its direct benefit from higher rates, can allow it to not only hold up better but to actually outperform. Insurance is a necessary service; policies must be renewed regardless of the economic cycle, providing a baseline of earnings stability.
So, can insurance ETFs outperform the S&P 500? The evidence suggests they can, and have at times, particularly in specific macroeconomic conditions. However, expecting them to consistently outperform over every multi-year period is unrealistic. The S&P 500's resilience and capture of broad economic growth make it a foundational holding for nearly any portfolio.
The smarter approach is not to choose one over the other, but to use them strategically. An insurance ETF can be a powerful tactical allocation within a diversified portfolio. It acts as: * A hedge against inflation and rising interest rates. * A defensive play during periods of economic uncertainty or market volatility. * A targeted bet on the long-term trends of climate adaptation and the digitalization of risk.
An investor might maintain a core position in an S&P 500 ETF for broad market growth and allocate a smaller percentage (e.g., 5-10%) to a sector ETF like KIE or IAK to capitalize on the unique opportunities present in the current macro environment. This strategy acknowledges the enduring power of the broad market while seeking to enhance returns and manage risk by leaning into a sector poised for a cyclical upswing. The question isn't about finding a single winner, but about building a smarter, more responsive portfolio for a world full of complex risks.
Copyright Statement:
Author: Farmers Insurance Kit
Link: https://farmersinsurancekit.github.io/blog/can-insurance-etfs-outperform-the-sampp-500.htm
Source: Farmers Insurance Kit
The copyright of this article belongs to the author. Reproduction is not allowed without permission.